↓ Skip to main content

Quasi-periodic Orbits in Siegel Disks/Balls and the Babylonian Problem

Overview of attention for article published in Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 153)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Quasi-periodic Orbits in Siegel Disks/Balls and the Babylonian Problem
Published in
Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, December 2018
DOI 10.1134/s1560354718060084
Authors

Yoshitaka Saiki, James A. Yorke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 67%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2018.
All research outputs
#16,550,722
of 24,353,295 outputs
Outputs from Regular and Chaotic Dynamics
#47
of 153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,197
of 445,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regular and Chaotic Dynamics
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,353,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 153 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.