Title |
Brief summary of French guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia in ICU
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-018-0444-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marc Leone, Lila Bouadma, Bélaïd Bouhemad, Olivier Brissaud, Stéphane Dauger, Sébastien Gibot, Sami Hraiech, Boris Jung, Eric Kipnis, Yoann Launey, Charles-Edouard Luyt, Dimitri Margetis, Fabrice Michel, Djamel Mokart, Philippe Montravers, Antoine Monsel, Saad Nseir, Jérôme Pugin, Antoine Roquilly, Lionel Velly, Jean-Ralph Zahar, Rémi Bruyère, Gérald Chanques |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 22% |
Brazil | 1 | 11% |
Colombia | 1 | 11% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 7 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 10% |
Researcher | 6 | 8% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Professor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 24% |
Unknown | 23 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 42% |
Engineering | 4 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 26 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,960,767
of 24,066,486 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#559
of 1,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,624
of 355,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#15
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,066,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.