↓ Skip to main content

Combining glucose and sodium acetate improves the growth of Neochloris oleoabundans under mixotrophic conditions

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Combining glucose and sodium acetate improves the growth of Neochloris oleoabundans under mixotrophic conditions
Published in
AMB Express, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13568-016-0180-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helder Rodrigues Silva, Cassio Egidio Cavenaghi Prete, Freddy Zambrano, Victor Hugo de Mello, Cesar Augusto Tischer, Diva Souza Andrade

Abstract

Mixotrophic cultivation is a potential approach to produce microalgal biomass that can be used as raw materials for renewable biofuels and animal feed, although using a suitable, cost-effective organic carbon source is crucial. Here, we used a Box-Behnken design with three factors, the glucose and sodium acetate concentrations, and the percentage of Bold's basal medium (BBM), to evaluate the effects of different carbon sources on biomass productivity and the protein and lipid contents of Neochloris oleoabundans (UTEX#1185). When grow at optimal levels of these factors, 100 % BBM plus 7.5 g L(-1) each of glucose and sodium acetate, N. oleoabundans yielded 1.75 g L(-1) of dry biomass, with 4.88 ± 0.09 % N, 24.01 ± 0.29-30.5 ± 0.38 % protein, and 34.4 % ± 0.81 lipids. A nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum ((1)H-NMR) of a lipid extract showed that the free fatty acid content was 11.25 %. Thus, combining glucose and sodium acetate during the mixotrophic cultivation of N. oleoabundans can yield greater amounts of biomass, proteins, and lipids for biofuel production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Professor 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 16%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Chemical Engineering 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 18 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2016.
All research outputs
#13,104,973
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#234
of 1,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,537
of 397,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.