| Title |
Role of the capillary fringe on the dilatation of a low porosity limestone submitted to unidirectional freezing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40645-018-0213-6 |
| Authors |
Celine Thomachot-Schneider, Emilie Huby, Kevin Chalons, Xavier Drothière, Patricia Vazquez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 3 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#17,996,379
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#412
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,317
of 352,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#24
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.