| Title |
Recent advances in 2D and 3D in vitro systems using primary hepatocytes, alternative hepatocyte sources and non-parenchymal liver cells and their use in investigating mechanisms of hepatotoxicity, cell signaling and ADME
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Toxicology, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00204-013-1078-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricio Godoy, Nicola J. Hewitt, Ute Albrecht, Melvin E. Andersen, Nariman Ansari, Sudin Bhattacharya, Johannes Georg Bode, Jennifer Bolleyn, Christoph Borner, Jan Böttger, Albert Braeuning, Robert A. Budinsky, Britta Burkhardt, Neil R. Cameron, Giovanni Camussi, Chong-Su Cho, Yun-Jaie Choi, J. Craig Rowlands, Uta Dahmen, Georg Damm, Olaf Dirsch, María Teresa Donato, Jian Dong, Steven Dooley, Dirk Drasdo, Rowena Eakins, Karine Sá Ferreira, Valentina Fonsato, Joanna Fraczek, Rolf Gebhardt, Andrew Gibson, Matthias Glanemann, Chris E. P. Goldring, María José Gómez-Lechón, Geny M. M. Groothuis, Lena Gustavsson, Christelle Guyot, David Hallifax, Seddik Hammad, Adam Hayward, Dieter Häussinger, Claus Hellerbrand, Philip Hewitt, Stefan Hoehme, Hermann-Georg Holzhütter, J. Brian Houston, Jens Hrach, Kiyomi Ito, Hartmut Jaeschke, Verena Keitel, Jens M. Kelm, B. Kevin Park, Claus Kordes, Gerd A. Kullak-Ublick, Edward L. LeCluyse, Peng Lu, Jennifer Luebke-Wheeler, Anna Lutz, Daniel J. Maltman, Madlen Matz-Soja, Patrick McMullen, Irmgard Merfort, Simon Messner, Christoph Meyer, Jessica Mwinyi, Dean J. Naisbitt, Andreas K. Nussler, Peter Olinga, Francesco Pampaloni, Jingbo Pi, Linda Pluta, Stefan A. Przyborski, Anup Ramachandran, Vera Rogiers, Cliff Rowe, Celine Schelcher, Kathrin Schmich, Michael Schwarz, Bijay Singh, Ernst H. K. Stelzer, Bruno Stieger, Regina Stöber, Yuichi Sugiyama, Ciro Tetta, Wolfgang E. Thasler, Tamara Vanhaecke, Mathieu Vinken, Thomas S. Weiss, Agata Widera, Courtney G. Woods, Jinghai James Xu, Kathy M. Yarborough, Jan G. Hengstler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | <1% |
| Germany | 6 | <1% |
| France | 6 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1312 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 287 | 21% |
| Researcher | 209 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 190 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 142 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 74 | 5% |
| Other | 186 | 14% |
| Unknown | 265 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 286 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 234 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 138 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 121 | 9% |
| Engineering | 112 | 8% |
| Other | 167 | 12% |
| Unknown | 295 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,521,135
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#95
of 2,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,926
of 215,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.