| Title |
HPTLC Screening of Folic Acid in Food: In Situ Derivatization with Ozone-Induced Fluorescence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food Analytical Methods, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12161-018-1374-z |
| Authors |
Ping Wang, Yisheng Chen, Xueming Xu, Bernhard Hellmann, Caihong Huang, Yuxiang Bai, Zhengyu Jin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 30% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2018.
All research outputs
#18,653,753
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from Food Analytical Methods
#241
of 582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,579
of 344,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Analytical Methods
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 582 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.