↓ Skip to main content

Comparative nutrient composition of selected wild edible mushrooms from two agro-ecological zones, Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Comparative nutrient composition of selected wild edible mushrooms from two agro-ecological zones, Uganda
Published in
SpringerPlus, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-1188-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Immaculate Nakalembe, John David Kabasa, Deogratias Olila

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 29 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Engineering 6 5%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 37 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,549,350
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#941
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,998
of 266,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#62
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.