↓ Skip to main content

A geometric approach to alternating k-linear forms

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
A geometric approach to alternating k-linear forms
Published in
Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10801-016-0730-6
Authors

Ilaria Cardinali, Luca Giuzzi, Antonio Pasini

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 40%
Researcher 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 5 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2016.
All research outputs
#5,297,022
of 7,069,916 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics
#210,124
of 400,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,954
of 320,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics
#15,629
of 24,765 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,069,916 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24,765 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.