↓ Skip to main content

Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria

Overview of attention for article published in Qualitative Sociology, March 1990
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 385)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8801 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Published in
Qualitative Sociology, March 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf00988593
Authors

Juliet M. Corbin, Anselm Strauss

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8,801 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 80 <1%
United Kingdom 50 <1%
Germany 35 <1%
Canada 19 <1%
Netherlands 16 <1%
South Africa 16 <1%
Australia 13 <1%
Portugal 12 <1%
Brazil 12 <1%
Other 124 1%
Unknown 8424 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1977 22%
Student > Master 1786 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 841 10%
Researcher 603 7%
Student > Bachelor 550 6%
Other 1311 15%
Unknown 1733 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1845 21%
Social Sciences 1750 20%
Computer Science 597 7%
Psychology 416 5%
Arts and Humanities 334 4%
Other 1887 21%
Unknown 1972 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,047,270
of 25,918,061 outputs
Outputs from Qualitative Sociology
#22
of 385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134
of 14,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Qualitative Sociology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them