↓ Skip to main content

CT imaging features of atrioventricular shunts: what the radiologist must know

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
CT imaging features of atrioventricular shunts: what the radiologist must know
Published in
Insights into Imaging, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13244-015-0452-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Nicolay, Rodrigo A. Salgado, Bharati Shivalkar, Paul L. Van Herck, Christiaan Vrints, Paul M. Parizel

Abstract

In the last decade, cardiac computed tomography (CT) has gained mainstream acceptance for the noninvasive exclusion of significant coronary disease in a selected population. Improvements in electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered imaging techniques also allow, by extension, a proper evaluation of the complete heart anatomy. Given the increasing worldwide clinical implementation of cardiac CT for coronary artery evaluation, radiologists can, incidentally, be confronted with unfamiliar and previously unsuspected non-coronary cardiac pathologies, including congenital morphological defects. This presence of congenital heart disease (CHD) should not be overlooked, being the most common form of birth defect, with a total birth prevalence of 9.1 per 1000 live births worldwide [1]. The prevalence of adult patients with CHD is estimated to be 3000 per million adults [2]. Ventricular septal defects (VSDs) are the most frequent subtypes of CHD, accounting together with atrial septal defects (ASDs) for nearly half of all CHD cases [1]. While some small defects are rarely symptomatic and can go undetected for life, others are clinically significant and require adequate and timely medical intervention. In this article, we present the CT imaging features of atrioventricular (AV) shunts, highlighting both their embryological origins and associated relevant clinical features. • Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect. • Ventricular and atrial septal defects account for nearly half of CHD cases. • Atrioventricular defects can frequently be detected on a cardiac CT. • Radiologists must be able to identify clinically significant atrioventricular defects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 12 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 60%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#15,815,423
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#684
of 1,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,327
of 395,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.