↓ Skip to main content

Plant growth-promoting effects of rhizospheric and endophytic bacteria associated with different tomato cultivars and new tomato hybrids

Overview of attention for article published in Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Plant growth-promoting effects of rhizospheric and endophytic bacteria associated with different tomato cultivars and new tomato hybrids
Published in
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40538-015-0051-3
Authors

Gennaro Roberto Abbamondi, Giuseppina Tommonaro, Nele Weyens, Sofie Thijs, Wouter Sillen, Panagiotis Gkorezis, Carmine Iodice, Wesley de Melo Rangel, Barbara Nicolaus, Jaco Vangronsveld

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 117 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 13%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 17%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 26 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,382,040
of 9,711,563 outputs
Outputs from Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
#2
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,736
of 342,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,711,563 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 31 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them