@byrd_nick If interested in fake barn cases (shameless self-promotion): https://t.co/M4pzFDwl2U
RT @xphilosopher: @AlexWiegmann1 @JustinCaouette @ax_phi @petemandik @keithfrankish @onemorebrown I wouldn't have thought that could ever h…
RT @xphilosopher: @AlexWiegmann1 @JustinCaouette @ax_phi @petemandik @keithfrankish @onemorebrown I wouldn't have thought that could ever h…
RT @xphilosopher: @AlexWiegmann1 @JustinCaouette @ax_phi @petemandik @keithfrankish @onemorebrown I wouldn't have thought that could ever h…
RT @xphilosopher: @AlexWiegmann1 @JustinCaouette @ax_phi @petemandik @keithfrankish @onemorebrown I wouldn't have thought that could ever h…
@AlexWiegmann1 @JustinCaouette @ax_phi @petemandik @keithfrankish @onemorebrown I wouldn't have thought that could ever happen, but Horvath & @AlexWiegmann1 show that it can Philosophical orthodoxy is that there is no knowledge in fake barn cases, but
RT @xphilosopher: @samschi @AlexWiegmann1 I love that paper! In case anyone is interested, it is at: https://t.co/gK8Wrmdpfx
@samschi @AlexWiegmann1 I love that paper! In case anyone is interested, it is at: https://t.co/gK8Wrmdpfx
(Paper by Horvath and Wiegmann: https://t.co/c3DEkBbry5)
“#philosophy might fail to adequately map the intuitions of its expert practitioners onto a disciplinary consensus.” https://t.co/qqJ9JrlLiR
Intuitive expertise and intuitions about knowledge - Online First - Springer https://t.co/eBn7HJTWJk