↓ Skip to main content

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00464-018-6400-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yunxiao Lyu, Yunxiao Cheng, Bin Wang, Sicong Zhao, Liang Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 21%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 25 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 49%
Unspecified 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 29 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,966,227
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#376
of 6,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,049
of 334,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#12
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.