↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of treatment plans for a high-field MRI-linac and a conventional linac for esophageal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of treatment plans for a high-field MRI-linac and a conventional linac for esophageal cancer
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00066-018-1386-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel Nachbar, David Mönnich, Paul Kalwa, Daniel Zips, Daniela Thorwarth, Cihan Gani

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 150%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Engineering 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2018.
All research outputs
#11,427,234
of 12,852,852 outputs
Outputs from Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
#253
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,844
of 301,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,852,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.