↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of treatment plans for a high-field MRI-linac and a conventional linac for esophageal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of treatment plans for a high-field MRI-linac and a conventional linac for esophageal cancer
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00066-018-1386-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel Nachbar, David Mönnich, Paul Kalwa, Daniel Zips, Daniela Thorwarth, Cihan Gani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 27%
Researcher 5 23%
Professor 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 27%
Physics and Astronomy 4 18%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 10 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#18,652,743
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
#460
of 768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,132
of 350,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
#15
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 768 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.