↓ Skip to main content

Nanomaterials for Functional Textiles and Fibers

Overview of attention for article published in Discover Nano, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 1,146)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
228 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
451 Mendeley
Title
Nanomaterials for Functional Textiles and Fibers
Published in
Discover Nano, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s11671-015-1195-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro J. Rivero, Aitor Urrutia, Javier Goicoechea, Francisco J. Arregui

Abstract

Nanoparticles are very interesting because of their surface properties, different from bulk materials. Such properties make possible to endow ordinary products with new functionalities. Their relatively low cost with respect to other nano-additives make them a promising choice for industrial mass-production systems. Nanoparticles of different kind of materials such as silver, titania, and zinc oxide have been used in the functionalization of fibers and fabrics achieving significantly improved products with new macroscopic properties. This article reviews the most relevant approaches for incorporating such nanoparticles into synthetic fibers used traditionally in the textile industry allowing to give a solution to traditional problems for textiles such as the microorganism growth onto fibers, flammability, robustness against ultraviolet radiation, and many others. In addition, the incorporation of such nanoparticles into special ultrathin fibers is also analyzed. In this field, electrospinning is a very promising technique that allows the fabrication of ultrathin fiber mats with an extraordinary control of their structure and properties, being an ideal alternative for applications such as wound healing or even functional membranes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 451 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 451 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 16%
Student > Master 63 14%
Researcher 52 12%
Student > Bachelor 45 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Other 61 14%
Unknown 127 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 64 14%
Chemistry 55 12%
Materials Science 54 12%
Chemical Engineering 27 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 3%
Other 71 16%
Unknown 165 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,321,286
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#16
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,500
of 399,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.