RT @ATomalty: However according to the equation Te should be the temperature at the top of the atmosphere(atmos). Also how can you assume a…
RT @ATomalty: https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC In the bible of Al Gore's Cult of Climatology in equation 1 S0(1−A)/4=σTe^4, where S0 = incoming so…
However according to the equation Te should be the temperature at the top of the atmosphere(atmos). Also how can you assume an atmos by which you are calculating the ave albedo =30% and then calculate the temperature at the surface assuming no atmos?
https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC In the bible of Al Gore's Cult of Climatology in equation 1 S0(1−A)/4=σTe^4, where S0 = incoming solar ave energy at top of atmos , A = ave albedo, σ = Stefan-Boltzmann constant = 5.67 x 10^-8 and Te is the equilibrium temp at su
RT @ATomalty: https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC https://t.co/Rbz1Pk9vRD The study and its supp materiel are the Bible/Koran "science" of global warmi…
https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC https://t.co/Rbz1Pk9vRD The study and its supp materiel are the Bible/Koran "science" of global warming. The title of the study is "A mental picture of the greenhouse effect". All based on climate models. No real world observations
@NOAAClimate @usgcrp @NOAANCEIclimate @EPA There is room for more indicators: the global area of daily fainfally (https://t.co/fFPNlJuqSj), the total mass of rain falling on Earth each day, and a global indicator of the atmospheric overturning (https://t.c
Nicely consistent with a different (and simpler) perspective of the greenhouse effect that I described in https://t.co/RtYGKnbNbp.
RT @ATomalty: https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC So, the bible of Al Gore's Church of Climatology says that photons are only absorbed on the way up an…
RT @ATomalty: https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC So, the bible of Al Gore's Church of Climatology says that photons are only absorbed on the way up an…
RT @ATomalty: https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC So, the bible of Al Gore's Church of Climatology says that photons are only absorbed on the way up an…
RT @ATomalty: https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC So, the bible of Al Gore's Church of Climatology says that photons are only absorbed on the way up an…
RT @ATomalty: https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC So, the bible of Al Gore's Church of Climatology says that photons are only absorbed on the way up an…
RT @ATomalty: https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC So, the bible of Al Gore's Church of Climatology says that photons are only absorbed on the way up an…
https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC At the surface 1.45 million CO2 molecules plus on ave 72.5 million water vapour molecules are waiting to capture each and every photon that is leaving the surface. 25% of the photons never get captured but none of the photons ge
https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC Their explanation for why the 254K temp altitude level changes as a response to increasing IR opacity of the atmos is that emissions from a constant height will to a greater degree become re-absorbed when the air becomes increasingl
https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC The bible of Al Gore's Church of Climatology has not proven that CO2 is the cause of the troposphere temperature increase.
https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC If we can't measure any increase in downward backward radiation, then how could there be any increase in upward IR? Just because the troposphere is warmer by a trend of 1.3C / century per satellite data, that does not mean that CO2
https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC So, the bible of Al Gore's Church of Climatology says that photons are only absorbed on the way up and they keep getting absorbed as they increase in altitude. This is wrong. Photons are emitted in all directions.
https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC A direct contradiction of Hulbert's paper of 1931. He wants the article to be cited as Benestad, R.E. (2017) 128: 679. https://t.co/d38reyoO9w Ketil Isaksen was the peer reviewer. The Norwegian Meteorological Institute partly financ
https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC "Hulburt in 1931, did not emphasise the vertical energy flow, the hydrological cycle, and changes in the greenhouse gas concentrations." https://t.co/CSZTxgw9kY "Calculation shows that 2x / 3x the CO2 of the atmos increases the a
https://t.co/ZpGJNQcl1w… So what the alarmists are saying is since this altitude of 7219m is increasing 2.3 m/yr that must mean the surface temp is increasing, but they assume that lapse rate is not changing. That is only valid if the density values change
https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC "the bulk emission altitude is the region where the temperature equals the emission temperature T = T e (Houghton 1991)." He means 254K or -19C . This happens at 7219 m.
If no one else has even attempted to prove this since 1931, this must be a fallacious claim. Hulbert's paper is paywalled, so I don't have access to it. I am not going to pay for a paper almost 100 years ago.
https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC The bible of Al Gore's Church of Climatology. "It has long been established that the bulk planetary heat loss is determined by atmospheric temps far above the surface (Hulburt 1931; North 1975)." North's 2 papers in 1975 had nothi
RT @ATomalty: https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC I posted this link before. It is the bible of the Church of Climatology in one succinct paper. Beca…
They say that increasing CO2 causes the temp gradient to move upward in vertical height so that the temp of 254 K at 6.5km has moved upward 2.3 m/yr. The 254 K temp is imp to the alarmists because they say that is the emission temp where most of the IR ge
https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC I posted this link before. It is the bible of the Church of Climatology in one succinct paper. Because the climate alarmists have been shown with data that there isn't an increase of DWIR over the years, they had to switch the "sc
@curryja https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC This, the bedwetters bible, is the only scientific explanation of Al Gore's GHG theory. All the alarmists preach from the same pulpit. It is all they have to stand on. Destroy this pedagocic argument and main stream climate
@NikolovScience https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC This, the bedwetters bible, is the only scientific explanation of Al Gore's GHG theory. All the alarmists preach from the same pulpit. It is all they have to stand on. Destroy this pedagocic argument and main stream
@SteveSGoddard https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC This, the bedwetters bible, is the only scientific explanation of Al Gore's GHG theory. All the alarmists preach from the same pulpit. It is all they have to stand on. Destroy this pedagocic argument and main stream c
RT @ATomalty: https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC This, the bedwetters bible, is the only scientific explanation of Al Gore's GHG theory. All the alar…
RT @ATomalty: https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC This, the bedwetters bible, is the only scientific explanation of Al Gore's GHG theory. All the alar…
I will be going over it with a fine tooth comb. I already know the main arguments in it but cmon skeptics let us all destroy this together.
https://t.co/dE4U2S3UyC This, the bedwetters bible, is the only scientific explanation of Al Gore's GHG theory. All the alarmists preach from the same pulpit. It is all they have to stand on. Destroy this pedagocic argument and you have destroyed main str
RT @Sci_Ani: The Greenhouse effect: a mental picture of the greenhouse effect that emphasises only its most essential aspects: https://t.co…
RT @Sci_Ani: The Greenhouse effect: a mental picture of the greenhouse effect that emphasises only its most essential aspects: https://t.co…
The Greenhouse effect: a mental picture of the greenhouse effect that emphasises only its most essential aspects: https://t.co/ai1qg5uJZB #GreenhouseEffectPhysics @RasmusBenestad https://t.co/RJhNRDZij8
Time to brag: Happy to post that my publication is among the top 10 downloaded in for 2018 from Springer. The paper provides a simple picture of the greenhouse effect. #topArticle2018 https://t.co/7GOFhO5r0o @Meteorologisk https://t.co/RVHalQjZub
A mental picture of the greenhouse effect https://t.co/DjCFEHu7ys
A mental picture of the greenhouse effect https://t.co/DjCFEHu7ys
@martinrypdal Mnge gode poenger. Vil gjenre tilføye at en ting som faller bort i diskusjonen, er hvordan vannets kretsløp endrer seg når drivhuseffekten øker. Klimaendringene kan ta form både som oppvarming og endring i nedbørsmønstrene. Har forsøkt å fork
@LifeIsThermal @blaubok Re: "Yeah" And you're still too stupid+dishonest to address the cited evidence. https://t.co/TXHY1HFQDF https://t.co/jnpxpALK19
@LifeIsThermal @blaubok Re: "Nope, not any arguments in that tweet." https://t.co/TXHY1HFQDF https://t.co/DRsvOCpz0p
@LifeIsThermal @blaubok Re: "A fantasy about the GHE written down is not evidence." You're still too dumb+dishonest to address the cited evidence. https://t.co/TXHY1HFQDF https://t.co/XZvdxRG4Xi
@LifeIsThermal @blaubok Re: "Hows the mental greenhouse effect working in your head?" You're clearly a very angry and dishonest troll. I'm simply using you for entertainment. https://t.co/TXHY1HFQDF https://t.co/qVNu4qS4XQ
RT @AtomsksSanakan: "Radiative forcing - measured at Earth's surface - corroborate the increasing greenhouse effect" https://t.co/ygB49NZq4…
"Radiative forcing - measured at Earth's surface - corroborate the increasing greenhouse effect" https://t.co/ygB49NZq45 "A mental picture of the greenhouse effect" https://t.co/TXHY1HFQDF https://t.co/wpLf1vtGvn https://t.co/Bl8TCeTKz1
RT @RasmusBenestad: Simplified explanation of the #greenhouseeffect: https://t.co/3V5tjw9A5N
Simplified explanation of the #greenhouseeffect: https://t.co/3V5tjw9A5N
RT @RasmusBenestad: @KHayhoe It's also important to remember the other side of the equation - why increased CO2 levels strengthen the #gre…
RT @RasmusBenestad: @KHayhoe It's also important to remember the other side of the equation - why increased CO2 levels strengthen the #gre…
RT @RasmusBenestad: @KHayhoe It's also important to remember the other side of the equation - why increased CO2 levels strengthen the #gre…
RT @RasmusBenestad: @KHayhoe It's also important to remember the other side of the equation - why increased CO2 levels strengthen the #gre…
RT @RasmusBenestad: @KHayhoe It's also important to remember the other side of the equation - why increased CO2 levels strengthen the #gre…
@KHayhoe It's also important to remember the other side of the equation - why increased CO2 levels strengthen the #greenhouseeffect and result in a global warming and a change in the hydrological cycle: https://t.co/Um6DtsKG6M
@duke_canuck @cathmckenna Greenhouse gas concentration increase owing to human activity is the cause of current climate warming. https://t.co/rFXZB53nAT
@IowaClimate This may help: "A mental picture of the greenhouse effect" https://t.co/6ASxSVbfdi
RT @RasmusBenestad: I thought the paper 'A mental picture of the greenhouse effect' would be a an easy paper to publish, but it was a long…
RT @RasmusBenestad: I thought the paper 'A mental picture of the greenhouse effect' would be a an easy paper to publish, but it was a long…
RT @RasmusBenestad: I thought the paper 'A mental picture of the greenhouse effect' would be a an easy paper to publish, but it was a long…
Perfect reading for the plane flight to KAUS and the #AMS2018 https://t.co/6XKEPwRcau
RT @RasmusBenestad: I thought the paper 'A mental picture of the greenhouse effect' would be a an easy paper to publish, but it was a long…
RT @RasmusBenestad: I thought the paper 'A mental picture of the greenhouse effect' would be a an easy paper to publish, but it was a long…
RT @RasmusBenestad: I thought the paper 'A mental picture of the greenhouse effect' would be a an easy paper to publish, but it was a long…
RT @RasmusBenestad: I thought the paper 'A mental picture of the greenhouse effect' would be a an easy paper to publish, but it was a long…
RT @RasmusBenestad: I thought the paper 'A mental picture of the greenhouse effect' would be a an easy paper to publish, but it was a long…
RT @RasmusBenestad: I thought the paper 'A mental picture of the greenhouse effect' would be a an easy paper to publish, but it was a long…
RT @RasmusBenestad: I thought the paper 'A mental picture of the greenhouse effect' would be a an easy paper to publish, but it was a long…
RT @RasmusBenestad: I thought the paper 'A mental picture of the greenhouse effect' would be a an easy paper to publish, but it was a long…
RT @RasmusBenestad: I thought the paper 'A mental picture of the greenhouse effect' would be a an easy paper to publish, but it was a long…