| Title |
Resource pulses of dead periodical cicadas increase the growth of American bellflower rosettes under competitive and non-competitive conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthropod-Plant Interactions, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11829-012-9223-2 |
| Authors |
Louie H. Yang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 76% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#489,477
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Arthropod-Plant Interactions
#4
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,455
of 191,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthropod-Plant Interactions
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them