| Title |
Visualization of sneeze ejecta: steps of fluid fragmentation leading to respiratory droplets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experiments in Fluids, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00348-015-2078-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
B. E. Scharfman, A. H. Techet, J. W. M. Bush, L. Bourouiba |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 28% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 73% |
| Scientists | 8 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 318 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 18% |
| Researcher | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 59 | 18% |
| Unknown | 85 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 86 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 12 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 67 | 21% |
| Unknown | 114 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 325. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#104,366
of 25,613,746 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#1
of 1,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,724
of 404,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,613,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.