↓ Skip to main content

Two accessory muscles of leg: potential source of entrapment of posterior tibial vessels

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Two accessory muscles of leg: potential source of entrapment of posterior tibial vessels
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00276-018-2115-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satheesha B. Nayak, Surekha Devadasa Shetty

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 45%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#16,049,105
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
#354
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,212
of 352,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.