@data_inspector @twityoupou84456 @IvanFu22087644 還是去年底和你討論的那個「多源多路徑假説」,這些基因可能來自東南亞母系的常染色體,這和南島Y染色體來自福建并不冲突,南島語的誕生可能來自於福建沿海Y染色體人群,而與東南亞母系沒有關係。南島人群常染色體帶有東南亞的基因並不值得奇怪,不能證明南島語誕生在東南亞https://t.co/nrmlcDY4jy https://t.co/K8yto6ooar
@data_inspector @twityoupou84456 @IvanFu22087644 如何證明Punan Batu祖先就是一直講南島語的? 强勢語言會取代弱勢語言。 中國人大部分是百越後裔,又有幾多會講百越語言? 南島人不是有母系是印尼的麽? 這些母系也可以帶來這些常染色體。 我們以前不是討論過這些印尼來源的母系血統麽? 這些母系的祖先未必是講南島語的。 https://t.co/nrmlcDY4jy https://t.co/YZMclkxZ10
@realsarahvernon @UCIrvinePD These were our patients. Never heard from them, or their family members again. Even their family in China said they were MIA. https://t.co/TvSXTlZiuf
@lVlarty @MindEnjoyer @ElonBachman @SashaGusevPosts And it's common for HBD advocates to say cases like diff avg IQ scores of pacific islanders vs. east asians (similar to US Black/White gap) reflect innate diffs--here time scale of geographic separation s
@Aiuanyu 遠古巽它人從巽它北上到台灣變成南島,反向對從巽它變成南洋輸出是蠻有可能,只是南洋還挖不到化石。 你可以去細看這兩篇 第一篇是支持南島人血緣從東南亞海洋擴散 第二篇是支持南島血緣從中國擴散,但比南島血緣更上游的東南亞血緣卻是從巽它擴散 https://t.co/QbtAYibC08 https://t.co/IhNSxmFBPj
@data_inspector @chunghua17 @Huqiuzheng 并沒有矛盾,因爲這篇論文的重點 既不是「出台灣假説」 也不是「出巽他假説」, 而是「多源多路徑假説」 https://t.co/jBVM9MhjGe
@data_inspector @chunghua17 @Huqiuzheng 應該不違反,因爲這篇論文的重點 既不是「出台灣假説」 也不是「出巽他假説」, 而是「多源多路徑假説」 https://t.co/jBVM9MhjGe
@data_inspector @chunghua17 @Huqiuzheng AI認爲:這篇論文中, 菲律賓灰色可能一部分是從台灣來的。 https://t.co/jMqpeVHdpY https://t.co/bejZgBYCMK
@data_inspector @chunghua17 @Huqiuzheng 我瞭解你的意思了,你講的是這個部分, 我問AI, 他還是堅灰色部分是出台灣,而非出巽他。 好像是: AI認爲論文中灰色部分是從台灣遷移到巽他, 而非從巽他遷移到台灣。 https://t.co/jMqpeVHLfw https://t.co/uwWx6MtK0B
@data_inspector @chunghua17 @Huqiuzheng 我問AI之後他是這樣回答的,紅色是台灣原住民最主要的祖先來源,是東北亞祖先成分。 我真的不太懂,但我感覺你理解的這些論文有誤。 希望你用AI來問一問這些論文都是什麽意思, 然後翻譯成漢字,再逐字推敲其本意, 不然你理解的可能真的不是這些論文本來的意思。 https://t.co/jMqpeVHdpY https://t.co/CZVMtBKUaz
@data_inspector @chunghua17 @Huqiuzheng 我真的看不出這篇論文證明了你所謂的「出巽他假説」, 我問了AI,他總結了這篇論文的主張, 是「多源多路徑假説」,而不主張「出台灣和出巽他」: https://t.co/jMqpeVHdpY https://t.co/ecDdlT6Ha5
@data_inspector @chunghua17 @Huqiuzheng 雖然我不懂,不過直覺感覺你這樣講不太對。 至於台灣原住民是否基因上大部分來自巽他, 我對數學很頭疼,看不懂這篇論文這些數據, 他確實又講灰色部分來自巽他, 但又講灰色、紅色都是出台灣的證據。 我從語義中感覺不到這篇論文有在堅持出巽他假説, 而否定了出台灣假説。 https://t.co/jMqpeVHdpY https://t.co/0ztI4a4VcG
@data_inspector @chunghua17 @Huqiuzheng 你所指的這篇論文圖中灰色部分是「台灣兩個原住民群體樣本」的60%-70%,而不是所有「台灣原住民群體」的80%,你要搞清楚欸 ! 一個鳳梨生了80%的蟲,不代表一個村子所有鳳梨都有80%的生蟲啊! 抽樣研究和整體研究是不同的呀!這是最基本的邏輯! https://t.co/jMqpeVHdpY https://t.co/vMMDmFApzY
@data_inspector @chunghua17 @Huqiuzheng 你發的這個截圖原文是這樣的, 這段落是研究「常染色體」具有巽他原生擴散之特性, 并不是「性染色體」。 因「Father Tongue hypothesis」, 原始南島人主要研究的是父系Y染色體的遺傳特性, 母系與常染色體都是父系遷徙過程中融入進原始南島人群的,不能證明南島人來自巽他。 https://t.co/jMqpeVHdpY https://t.co/fgpiVFDoY1
RT @data_inspector: @ShirleySimpsons @Huqiuzheng 南洋的B4a1a我記得有14700年,台灣最多就6000-10000年而已 https://t.co/QbtAYibC08
@ShirleySimpsons @Huqiuzheng 南洋的B4a1a我記得有14700年,台灣最多就6000-10000年而已 https://t.co/QbtAYibC08
@Dang_Liu @PNASNexus https://t.co/VaW1bhfZeF https://t.co/4pubfCm1rT Both of these research "oppose" out of Taiwan hypothesis But the research which you published suggest that these research support out of Taiwan can be tracked back to 8ka??? What you d
The following links are the missing link to the video: https://t.co/TvSXTlZiuf
@a95650482 @WillingWitness Pretty much. Before Africa, America, and Asia it was Lemuria, then Atlantis. Mu Mu’ur (Moor) LeMU’UR’ia, aka Lamanites https://t.co/CybXSpWBMg https://t.co/TvSXTlZiuf https://t.co/MkFouzLHBy https://t.co/YASrk1FvVi
@agoodflounder 感謝分享,2016年就有研究指出台灣原住民的母系血緣像是B4a1a跟E是從東南亞島嶼地區北上的研究。 https://t.co/QbtAYibC08
@Aichi2964 @Vittorio998998 論MTDNA印尼都還有最原始活著的M/N,馬來印尼都還有10-20%的MTDNA能追到50000年前 https://t.co/VaW1bhfZeF
@Jessenielle @kentvrama Nah https://t.co/QbtAYibC08 Resolving the ancestors of Austronesia speaker suggests that Austronesia blood origined in ISEA . Before Austrosic came to Sundaland. Austronesia blood have already existed in Sundalan.But Most of them i
@Abdul_Salsalin @kruuumee @KHAMCHANH @CourtLoveCox yes.that true Science suggests that Malay mt dna is older than China https://t.co/VaW1bhfZeF
@qayyumlatifs @MHHBJA2005 @uzairilationn @_Tharrence @amisyakhan @SyedSaddiq @FarhanVLOGS @farhanvlogs2 Taiwanese ancestry from Neolithic times. Not my problem you didn't care to check their history. Like I said terminologies don't make any sense when it c
In response to the study, proponents of the Sundaland model acknowledged that there was a later migration from Taiwan https://t.co/W8IFgGmcMq
RT @iseaarchaeology: #Austronesian #language expansion and #population dispersal in the #Neolithic! https://t.co/7esMqz4lgT https://t.co/HB…
Resolving the ancestry of Austronesian-speaking populations https://t.co/gNnZXXMH0N
Resolving the ancestry of Austronesian-speaking populations. https://t.co/agUB2aPPQS
Resolving the ancestry of Austronesian-speaking populations https://t.co/S8lPY7VNdR
#Austronesian #language expansion and #population dispersal in the #Neolithic! https://t.co/7esMqz4lgT https://t.co/HBWh9HqDp9
Resolving the ancestry of Austronesian-speaking populations https://t.co/M8BEA8rwza
Resolving the ancestry of Austronesian-speaking populations - Online First - Springer https://t.co/XbXWbfrG8h
I'm reading https://t.co/L4RLyyipLo #springerlink
Resolving the ancestry of Austronesian-speaking populations https://t.co/SClL2h8zLf
Resolving the ancestry of Austronesian-speaking populations: https://t.co/EsGduvljOr
オーストロネシア語族の拡散経路・時期を確実化:University of Huddersfield。 https://t.co/VLNpUXITwZ …
https://t.co/A9ZgW8KylB #neolithic research Resolving the ancestry of Austronesian-speaking populations.
New light on Austronesians and others in ISEA https://t.co/kWC3Hanude #springerlink