↓ Skip to main content

Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Orthodontics, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets
Published in
Progress in Orthodontics, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40510-016-0118-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Spyridon N. Papageorgiou, Iosif Sifakakis, Ioannis Doulis, Theodore Eliades, Christoph Bourauel

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the torque efficacy of square and rectangular wires in 0.018- and 0.022-in. conventionally ligated brackets. Brackets of the same prescription were evaluated in both slot dimensions. Identical acrylic resin models of the maxilla were bonded with the brackets and mounted on the Orthodontic Measurement and Simulation System. Ten 0.018 × 0.018 in., 0.018 × 0.022 in., and 0.018 × 0.025 in. stainless steel wires were evaluated in the 0.018-in. brackets and ten 0.019 × 0.019 in., 0.019 × 0.025 in., and 0.019 × 0.026 in. stainless steel wires were evaluated in the 0.022-in. brackets. A 15° buccal root torque was gradually applied to the right central incisor bracket, and the moments were recorded at this position. One-way ANOVA was applied for both bracket slot sizes along with post hoc analysis for the various archwire sizes. The mean measured moments varied between 10.78 and 30.60 Nmm among the assessed wire-and-bracket combinations. Both square and rectangular archwires in the 0.018-in. bracket system exerted statistically significantly higher moments in comparison with their counterparts in the 0.022-in. bracket system. Rectangular archwires exerted statistically significantly higher moments than square archwires, both for the 0.018- and the 0.022-in. bracket system. Rectangular archwires seem to be more efficient in torque exertion, especially in 0.018-in. brackets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 19%
Student > Postgraduate 9 17%
Researcher 6 12%
Professor 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 54%
Engineering 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#203
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,158
of 402,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.