↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of the Early Start Denver Model: a Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 107)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of the Early Start Denver Model: a Systematic Review
Published in
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40489-015-0068-3
Authors

Hannah Waddington, Larah van der Meer, Jeff Sigafoos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Unspecified 8 13%
Researcher 8 13%
Other 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 42%
Unspecified 12 20%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 13 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,376,009
of 13,040,236 outputs
Outputs from Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#22
of 107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,491
of 359,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,040,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.