↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of Novel Polymer-Based Pyridine Stationary Phases for Supercritical Fluid Chromatography

Overview of attention for article published in Chromatographia, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Characterization of Novel Polymer-Based Pyridine Stationary Phases for Supercritical Fluid Chromatography
Published in
Chromatographia, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10337-018-3598-x
Authors

Caroline West, Elise Lemasson, Kanji Nagai, Tohru Shibata, Pilar Franco, Sophie Bertin, Philippe Hennig, Eric Lesellier

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 50%
Student > Master 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 50%
Unspecified 2 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#10,225,889
of 12,808,036 outputs
Outputs from Chromatographia
#556
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,851
of 304,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromatographia
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,808,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them