Four commentaries on the use of students and professionals in empirical software engineering experiments

RT @emsejournal: Four commentaries on the use of students and professionals in empirical software engineering experiments. Feldt, Zimmerman…

Four commentaries on the use of students and professionals in empirical software engineering experiments. Feldt, Zimmermann, Bergersen, Falessi, Jedlitschka, Juristo, Münch, Oivo, Runeson, Shepperd, Sjøberg, Turhan https://t.co/db7yRk4H1u

RT @mauricioaniche: I finally had time to read the commentaries on the use of students and professionals in empirical software engineering…

I finally had time to read the commentaries on the use of students and professionals in empirical software engineering experiments. Amazing discussion! And thanks @emsejournal for organizing such a debate! https://t.co/Lzx5ysh3jh

RT @SoftEngResGrp: There are many more dimensions to this than students vs professionals. It depends on what you want to study! See four re…

There are many more dimensions to this than students vs professionals. It depends on what you want to study! See four recent commentaries in @emsejournal https://t.co/Q42GWG1oM6

My contribution: Realism in Software Engineering Experiments -- A Search in Vain? https://t.co/elMzPcnbl3 @emsejournal

Four commentaries on the use of students and professionals in empirical software engineering experiments https://t.co/hRakk1bXxA @emsejournal

https://t.co/eBCf3FfNBy

Super interesting commentary on representative empirical sampling in software engineering. Relevant -- and in line with our work -- for #infosec research as well.

Inferencing into the void: problems with implicit populations Comments on `Empirical software engineering experts on the use of students and professionals in experiments'. https://t.co/CuN894DX41