@Benedikt_Hell 2/3 For comparing disciplines in psychology (IO, educational, clinical etc.) traditional scientometric approaches using manifest database categories (e. g., Krampen, 2016, https://t.co/iXe5llFzg5) would be a rational approach.
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Is psychology becoming a field without a history? The number of papers about the history of psychology is falling https:…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Is psychology becoming a field without a history? The number of papers about the history of psychology is falling https:…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Is psychology becoming a field without a history? The number of papers about the history of psychology is falling https:…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Is psychology becoming a field without a history? The number of papers about the history of psychology is falling https:…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Is psychology becoming a field without a history? The number of papers about the history of psychology is falling https:…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Is psychology becoming a field without a history? The number of papers about the history of psychology is falling https:…
Is psychology becoming a field without a history? The number of papers about the history of psychology is falling https://t.co/nTRWiEvhNf
I'm reading "Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science?" ;-) https://t.co/In87qF9bF8 #springerlink
Scientometric trend shows that Is psychology becoming an "unhistorical" science; I bet other disciplines are too. https://t.co/xYIFKog7EH
RT @PsyBorgsYork: Brand new article in Scientometrics about the current state of History of Psychology. https://t.co/FI862CfTIm #histpsy #h…