↓ Skip to main content

Different uses of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory in public mental health research: what is their value for guiding public mental health policy and practice?

Overview of attention for article published in Social Theory & Health, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Different uses of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory in public mental health research: what is their value for guiding public mental health policy and practice?
Published in
Social Theory & Health, March 2018
DOI 10.1057/s41285-018-0065-6
Authors

Malin Eriksson, Mehdi Ghazinour, Anne Hammarström

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 24%
Unspecified 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 33%
Social Sciences 23 25%
Unspecified 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2018.
All research outputs
#10,420,424
of 13,640,418 outputs
Outputs from Social Theory & Health
#205
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,056
of 312,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Theory & Health
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,640,418 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.