Title |
Assessing the mutagenicity of protic ionic liquids using the mini Ames test
|
---|---|
Published in |
Sustainable Chemical Processes, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40508-015-0044-3 |
Authors |
Joshua E. S. J. Reid, Neil Sullivan, Lorna Swift, Guy A. Hembury, Seishi Shimizu, Adam J. Walker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 24% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 19% |
Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 7 | 33% |
Chemical Engineering | 5 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2016.
All research outputs
#18,434,182
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Sustainable Chemical Processes
#46
of 62 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,931
of 386,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainable Chemical Processes
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them