| Title |
Microfluidic multi-analyte gradient generator
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-010-4168-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liaoran Cao, Xinyu Zhang, Alix Grimley, Anna R. Lomasney, Michael G. Roper |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 42% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 13 | 50% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#2,202
of 9,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,861
of 105,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#34
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.