Title |
Catalyst deactivation and regeneration in low temperature ethanol steam reforming with Rh/CeO2–ZrO2 catalysts
|
---|---|
Published in |
Catalysis Letters, August 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10562-006-0082-2 |
Authors |
Hyun-Seog Roh, Alexandru Platon, Yong Wang, David L. King |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 57 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Professor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 17 | 29% |
Chemical Engineering | 10 | 17% |
Engineering | 5 | 9% |
Materials Science | 4 | 7% |
Energy | 3 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 16 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,330,335
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Catalysis Letters
#16
of 919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,144
of 65,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Catalysis Letters
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 919 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them