↓ Skip to main content

Three-Dimensional Image and Video Processing

Overview of attention for article published in EURASIP Journal on Image & Video Processing, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 164)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Three-Dimensional Image and Video Processing
Published in
EURASIP Journal on Image & Video Processing, January 2008
DOI 10.1155/2008/924703
Authors

Peter Eisert, Marc Pollefeys, Stefano Tubaro

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 50%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 50%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,780,137
of 12,875,491 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Image & Video Processing
#17
of 164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,806
of 259,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Image & Video Processing
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,875,491 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them