@alixabeth @kate_manne @designmom You mean despite the feminist gender scholars and activists who make it the center of their activity to put in women en masse, and Wikipedia's own ongoing affirmative action? @alicetiara https://t.co/nFa4L9RY8w https://
RT @taih: @MarielaQuest @Marlon_PhD_UOC éste es un aspecto, pero hay más. por ejemplo, diferente percepción sobre la capacidad o experticia…
@MarielaQuest @Marlon_PhD_UOC éste es un aspecto, pero hay más. por ejemplo, diferente percepción sobre la capacidad o experticia explica (al menos en parte) la diferencia en la edición: https://t.co/YrAHFayXoT
@schemaly @CJFerguson1111 "Women’s profiles...have always been subject to more aggressive editing, gender essentialist norms, reputational assaults etc." Source and cause? Doubtful, and in need of controlling for feminist activism https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY
@geckospots @MeganPosco @SamyStClair Maybe even sociolinguistics of gender. Oh, and as to criticism, go on to read about this: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY
@FakePaperclips This is the one I remembered off-hand for that exact statement but there's a LOT of work about gender and wikipedia. https://t.co/OLd9Szl6nE
@KatMurti @ilusasha @FeministLiberty IT'll be fine, women love asking audience questions (https://t.co/o7l5i89gul). They are so motivated to speak, they love editiing Wikipedia too (https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY). - That narrative is seriously incomplete, at bes
@MarinaAdshade Thank you. Alas, then what I have said applies in full, and your Chinese Economic History analogy doesn't seem to hold. By the way: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY; https://t.co/eU80NX5Bfm
@opietasanimi @womeninclassics https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY @ShadiBartsch
@BetseyStevenson @TDeryugina Women generally more sensitive. Tender-mindedness&neuroticism (personality traits). Harassment. Willingness to reconcile. --Person v. thing,relationship versus task-orientation. Need to belong (https://t.co/lXgkkK4f7p). --
@ArmaniLab @amy_harmon @PracheeAC @theNASEM @JohnsHopkins Combine with this https://t.co/lXgkkK4f7p and this https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY
@SameenaKluck @smbrnsn @ABAesq This essay is pretty interesting (along the classic Azmat/Ferrer study). And, again, I guess one finds no mention of these aspects. (Filed under "social constraints"?) Another approach I find illuminating is comparing things
@PsychoSchmitt @nikkiusher Here's Pew on harassment: https://t.co/oamVvydtni; here's women doing Wikipedia: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY. Look up the sex diffs in interests, knowledge (particularly politics), & ambition yourself. - The time argument is hila
@LiglyCnsrvatari @larabazelon @CBHessick Incidentally, that also happens when women don't have to do makeup, see Wikipedia: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY If conferences are anything to go by, it's impressive that there are so many trial ladies: https://t.co/nuc
Wikipedia: https://t.co/bBXmWtUIEV; https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY People v. Thing; Task v. Relationship Orientation: https://t.co/pZlgTmAeTJ; https://t.co/h2RrzTIUfm; https://t.co/qTIDsnCDV1; https://t.co/HeWDWKS6b4
@wikimediauk @nickdonnelly https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY And your "solution" is to have Women's Studies - funded by tax payers, top down, politically biased, etc. - edit Wikipedia. Totally in line with its principles https://t.co/eU80NX5Bfm cc @phl43
@ThomasGalvin @CShadegg The entire thing is utterly absurd, barriers to entrance are extremely low, no need for any capital, affirmative action, etc. -- and they still try to turn this into a narrative of discrimination, rather than the confirmation of sex
@GrettaLouw @FeministLiberty Here's a comparable effort, coming up with all sorts of rules to have women ask questions at conferences. https://t.co/nucilW1ry7 - Women's Studies: https://t.co/eU80NX5Bfm ; https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY
@feminiscience https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY That now is despite prolonged affirmative action by Wikepedia and orgs. Women's studies professors actually and officially have their students edit articles.
@surveyfunk @pewresearch @sciam @PsychRabble The reaction to "the Google memo" strongly indicate distorted perception: https://t.co/y9k2wrfzgE Take Wikipedia, too: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY ; and this one: https://t.co/nucilW1ry7 Denying all these sex diffs
@nberlat @CathyReisenwitz As for status-seeking/ambition and women opting out: https://t.co/yrTeejaD2p (w/ reference to https://t.co/BT5RHzaIjo). Politics: https://t.co/dVBi5ocolL ; https://t.co/mJdZRIACVI ; https://t.co/VdByCsQj9f; even Wikipedia authorsh
@nprmonkeysee @ENBrown Yes, awful record-keeping, and this: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY ; https://t.co/nucilW1ry7
@schemaly @KirstenPowers What exactly is "cultural choice" supposed to mean? It's also a "cultural choice" to not have it be 90% Cookie Monster monologues. Oh, by the way, here's girls making "cultural choices": https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY
@emayfarris @CaitlinPacific 2 By the way, here are Wikipedia gap and Question at Conference gap: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY ; https://t.co/nucilW1ry7 (You may move on to self-segregation of children, and sex diffs in turn-taking/holding the floor/competitiven
@RebeccaSear @hbdchick I like this one: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY
@leah_boustan 1 Why did other professions fail at that? Also compare this: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY
@espiers 2 Or just absorve how it works out when single men and women pursue preferences and compete: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY
@politicalelle @CHSommers @aimeeble @YouTube 2 These two provide further perspective: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY ; https://t.co/0KXhW5u28l
@ENBrown Here, build sth w/ these four: https://t.co/BT5RHzaIjo ; https://t.co/yrTeejaD2p ; https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY ; https://t.co/lXgkkK4f7p
@robert_mariani @CathyReisenwitz 2 Applies to comedy: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY ; https://t.co/subMA7x40S
@NinjaEconomics https://t.co/BT5RHzaIjo - Consider "Wikipedia entrepreneurship", easy "market" access, no funding problems: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY
@CathyReisenwitz @allisonveronica 1 Go thru bar on the right: https://t.co/4KXRoLoBpc ; https://t.co/mdE2Wzpbum ; https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY
@RAinDiercks Übrigens 5: Auch außerhalb von Unternehmens-Organisationen verhalten sich Frauen so weiblich: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY
@nsfaber Compare: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY
@rey_z @ENBrown Incidentally, Wiki-women: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY ; https://t.co/eqxefgu25T
@NinjaEconomics @hbdchick @DataIsBeautiful That's pretty interesting. Cf. Wikipedia entries: https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY
@TobiasDuenow @bilkayoeney Only 13% of Wikipedia contributors are women. Pathetic women? https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY Try the adjusted wage gap.
Effects of diversity (costs of affirmative action not fully accounted for): https://t.co/0e5TyeAY7P "Case study": https://t.co/nFa4L9AngY
If you require #highered students to edit Wikipedia, are the men or women more likely to benefit? https://t.co/CRSgQTYeQp #ITTSII16
@alinelernerLLC 3 Compare this (open access): https://t.co/nFa4L9RY8w
Where are the women in Wikipedia? Understanding the different psychological experiences https://t.co/7uHH5Y4KBP #gender #wikipedia
@staeiou @natematias Understanding the Different Psychological Experiences of Men and Women in Wikipedia https://t.co/LPcfqf7Qkk
confidence in expertise and discomfort with editing linked to a smaller number of women(vs men) writing in wikipedia https://t.co/w8nY2pk7Ic
RT @Research_Voice: Differences in confidence in expertise & discomfort with editing partly explain gender gap in Wikipedia contribution ht…
Differences in confidence in expertise & discomfort with editing partly explain gender gap in Wikipedia contribution https://t.co/uBGjpzvlG9
RT @DegenRolf: Women contribute far less to Wikipedia because of discomfort with conflict and less confidence in their expertise. https://t…
RT @DegenRolf: Women contribute far less to Wikipedia because of discomfort with conflict and less confidence in their expertise. https://t…
RT @DegenRolf: Women contribute far less to Wikipedia because of discomfort with conflict and less confidence in their expertise. https://t…
RT @DegenRolf: Women contribute far less to Wikipedia because of discomfort with conflict and less confidence in their expertise. https://t…
RT @DegenRolf: Women contribute far less to Wikipedia because of discomfort with conflict and less confidence in their expertise. https://t…
Women contribute far less to Wikipedia because of discomfort with conflict and less confidence in their expertise. https://t.co/5dWbBKZJ7m
Women contribute far less to Wikipedia because of discomfort with conflict and less confidence in their expertise. https://t.co/xT99BWHKqy