↓ Skip to main content

Conceptualising and supporting the learning process by conceptual mapping

Overview of attention for article published in Smart Learning Environments, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Conceptualising and supporting the learning process by conceptual mapping
Published in
Smart Learning Environments, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40561-014-0007-2
Authors

Roger Hartley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 13 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 31%
Computer Science 5 16%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,547,315
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Smart Learning Environments
#127
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,184
of 363,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Smart Learning Environments
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.