↓ Skip to main content

Current trends in tendinopathy: consensus of the ESSKA basic science committee. Part II: treatment options

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Current trends in tendinopathy: consensus of the ESSKA basic science committee. Part II: treatment options
Published in
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40634-018-0145-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Abat, H. Alfredson, M. Cucchiarini, H. Madry, A. Marmotti, C. Mouton, J. M. Oliveira, H. Pereira, G. M. Peretti, C. Spang, J. Stephen, C. J. A. van Bergen, L. de Girolamo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 23%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 29%
Sports and Recreations 12 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 30 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,422,003
of 15,077,935 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#14
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,292
of 273,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,077,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them