↓ Skip to main content

Position and Content Paradigms in Genome Rearrangements: The Wild and Crazy World of Permutations in Genomics

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Position and Content Paradigms in Genome Rearrangements: The Wild and Crazy World of Permutations in Genomics
Published in
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11538-018-0514-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sangeeta Bhatia, Pedro Feijão, Andrew R. Francis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,806,022
of 12,936,999 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#129
of 661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,446
of 261,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,936,999 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 661 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.