↓ Skip to main content

How (not) to renormalize integral equations with singular potentials in effective field theory

Overview of attention for article published in European Physical Journal A -- Hadrons & Nuclei, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
How (not) to renormalize integral equations with singular potentials in effective field theory
Published in
European Physical Journal A -- Hadrons & Nuclei, November 2018
DOI 10.1140/epja/i2018-12632-1
Authors

E. Epelbaum, A. M. Gasparyan, J. Gegelia, Ulf-G. Meißner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 64%
Student > Master 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 9 82%
Unspecified 2 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#11,356,340
of 12,768,104 outputs
Outputs from European Physical Journal A -- Hadrons & Nuclei
#709
of 879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,183
of 259,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Physical Journal A -- Hadrons & Nuclei
#27
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,768,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 879 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.