↓ Skip to main content

How (not) to renormalize integral equations with singular potentials in effective field theory

Overview of attention for article published in The European Physical Journal A, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
How (not) to renormalize integral equations with singular potentials in effective field theory
Published in
The European Physical Journal A, November 2018
DOI 10.1140/epja/i2018-12632-1
Authors

E. Epelbaum, A. M. Gasparyan, J. Gegelia, Ulf-G. Meißner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 56%
Unspecified 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 78%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#21,180,380
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal A
#1,389
of 1,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,617
of 353,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal A
#25
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,862 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.