↓ Skip to main content

The clinical and social construction of the Paichais of Macau

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The clinical and social construction of the Paichais of Macau
Published in
Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/2195-3007-3-6
Authors

Chi Chuen Chan, Keis Ohtsuka

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 17%
Brazil 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 50%
Student > Master 2 33%
Lecturer 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 67%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,398,269
of 11,878,459 outputs
Outputs from Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health
#25
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,305
of 121,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,878,459 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them