がん患者のおいてセカンドオピニオンにより、より良い医療を提供できるか レビー論文です https://t.co/D6n4KkbJb4
"Changes in diagnosis, treatment or prognosis occurred in 12–69 % of cases" https://t.co/qGYSH1NG69 RT to raise awareness #SecondOpinion
Always nice to see studies asking Qs that matter in routine clinical practice. Getting 2nd options at least brings peace of mind to pts. https://t.co/KNbrPReznu
RT @pash22: Is there evid 4 a better health care for cancer patients after a second opinion? A systematic review https://t.co/v8pcr3dubs @o…
Is there evid 4 a better health care for cancer patients after a second opinion? A systematic review https://t.co/v8pcr3dubs @oncology_bg
Do you get better #cancer care if you get a second opinion? https://t.co/rx1HGCT06p via @VirginiaWalley
Is there evidence for a better care for cancer pxs after a #SecondOpinion? Systematic review @AHRQ #PatientSafety https://t.co/RyM9WtWiyG
Is there evidence for a better care for cancer pxs after a #SecondOpinion? Systematic review @AHRQ #PatientSafety https://t.co/Ww0OWYhhmt
Is there evidence for a better care for cancer pxs after a #SecondOpinion? Systematic review @AHRQ #PatientSafety https://t.co/YpOl0TUz5v
Is there evidence for a better care for cancer pxs after a #SecondOpinion? Systematic review @AHRQ #PatientSafety https://t.co/ByUCC5gubf
ちなみにセカンドオピニオンの結果「診断や治療法、予後が変わったのは12~69%」。むずかしい症例でセカンドに行ってる側面はありそうですが、適切に行えば有用そうな数字ですね。 https://t.co/rjJtrfTO3E
教えて頂いた概説、いろいろ興味深い。論文により6,5~36%の患者さんが様々な理由でセカンドオピニオン求めてたんだけど、「43~82%は元の診断と治療法が正しかった」と。少なくとも、「95%誤り」みたいな本は単なる煽りですね。 https://t.co/rjJtrfTO3E
RT @acetylseagull1: @maturiya_itto さっと探したらこんなReviewが。 https://t.co/xc9VWhuSFI
@maturiya_itto さっと探したらこんなReviewが。 https://t.co/xc9VWhuSFI