| Title |
Telehealth Interventions Designed for Women: an Evidence Map
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-018-4655-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen M. Goldstein, Leah L. Zullig, Eric A. Dedert, Amir Alishahi Tabriz, Timothy W. Brearly, Giselle Raitz, Suchita Shah Sata, John D. Whited, Hayden B. Bosworth, Adelaide M. Gordon, Avishek Nagi, John W. Williams, Jennifer M. Gierisch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 50% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 29% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 258 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 83 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 18% |
| Psychology | 29 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 88 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,085,979
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,706
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,770
of 349,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#43
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.