↓ Skip to main content

Systemic risk management and investment analysis with financial network analytics: research opportunities and challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Financial Innovation, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Systemic risk management and investment analysis with financial network analytics: research opportunities and challenges
Published in
Financial Innovation, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40854-015-0001-x
Authors

Daning Hu, Gerhard Schwabe, Xiao Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 23 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 17%
Computer Science 8 12%
Mathematics 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 22 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,546,615
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Financial Innovation
#89
of 158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,368
of 267,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Financial Innovation
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.