↓ Skip to main content

Karachi tides during the 1945 Makran tsunami

Overview of attention for article published in Geoscience Letters, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 192)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Karachi tides during the 1945 Makran tsunami
Published in
Geoscience Letters, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40562-018-0121-z
Authors

Loyce M. Adams, Brian F. Atwater, Haider Hasan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Lecturer 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 64%
Mathematics 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,977,322
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Geoscience Letters
#34
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,555
of 341,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoscience Letters
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them