@nosratullah Be careful though, as it is, ultimately, a choice. They may want you to say why it should be .05 for *your* work, which is otherwise merely a (useful) convention. Perhaps you have no (good) reason to use something different from convention? ht
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @blackgoatpod: There has been lots more good discussion about redefining vs. justifying significance thresholds than what we discussed i…
There has been lots more good discussion about redefining vs. justifying significance thresholds than what we discussed in our last episode - see this commentary by @JPdeRuiter https://t.co/rtTIiWWZ2C
RT @briandavidearp: Redefine or justify? Comments on the alpha debate https://t.co/ouqHoLSmvm https://t.co/mzmyiz51EX
Redefine or justify? Comments on the alpha debate https://t.co/ouqHoLSmvm https://t.co/mzmyiz51EX
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
Mais uma pro debate @altayals https://t.co/ygQuzRc6S2
RT @bxjaeger: Redefine or justify your alpha? @JPdeRuiter weighs in on the debate https://t.co/p0knZRWDkE https://t.co/gqPqRfZvyU
RT @bxjaeger: Redefine or justify your alpha? @JPdeRuiter weighs in on the debate https://t.co/p0knZRWDkE https://t.co/gqPqRfZvyU
Redefine or justify your alpha? @JPdeRuiter weighs in on the debate https://t.co/p0knZRWDkE https://t.co/gqPqRfZvyU
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @keanan_joyner: The main argument (replication likelihood) for using p < .005 as the new “significance threshold” has always been absurd…
Good idea or bad idea? This would, retroactively, make a huge chunk of the literature effectively null results. That being said it would eliminate being able to say .05-.06 results are significant at the trend level.
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
The main argument (replication likelihood) for using p < .005 as the new “significance threshold” has always been absurd to me because it doesn’t improve replication at p < .005, only at p < .05. How does this argument not collapse on itself?
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
A level wider reading:Interesting points of view on statistical significance in relation to replication problems in Psychological research.
RT @klhoughton: Note that this would also invalidate almost everything in economics that doesn't "prove" an Accounting Identity (e.g., Cham…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
Note that this would also invalidate almost everything in economics that doesn't "prove" an Accounting Identity (e.g., Chamley, 1986)
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
Social studies researchers need Jesus, at this point...
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
Lol
Now this is interesting.
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https:/…
"Lowering our alpha level to .005 is at this moment the best way to combat the replication crisis in psychology" https://t.co/f3QXfCxVAv says @JPdeRuiter contra @lakens https://t.co/N49US5rVYm
The new post-science world. You are 100% right and Daniel is also 100% right. No problem.
RT @stephensenn: I look forward to reading it. There are two violently opposed automatic Bayesians schools: the dividers insult the Bayes…
RT @stephensenn: I look forward to reading it. There are two violently opposed automatic Bayesians schools: the dividers insult the Bayes…
I look forward to reading it. There are two violently opposed automatic Bayesians schools: the dividers insult the Bayes Factor Faction as lumping proletariat and the BFF regard the dividers as smear delusionists.
@JPdeRuiter @lakens Really, we're all just trying to write enough back-and-forth papers on the topic to get appropriately powered statistical inference from them. (Only a couple dozen more to go!)
Faudrait-il supprimer l’expression « statistiquement significatif » ?https://t.co/ixjw7d5CVL … https://t.co/psChRDQNyD #psychologie #reproductibilité