↓ Skip to main content

The contrasting genetic patterns of two sympatric flying fox species from the Comoros and the implications for conservation

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
The contrasting genetic patterns of two sympatric flying fox species from the Comoros and the implications for conservation
Published in
Conservation Genetics, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10592-018-1111-6
Authors

Mohamed Thani Ibouroi, Ali Cheha, Veronique Arnal, Erwan Lagadec, Pablo Tortosa, Gildas Le Minter, Said Ali Ousseni Dhurham, Claudine Montgelard, Aurélien Besnard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 50%
Environmental Science 2 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,068,360
of 13,361,190 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#175
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,090
of 266,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,361,190 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.