↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the Use of 18F-FDG PET CT for External Beam Radiotherapy Planning in Gynaecological Malignancies

Overview of attention for article published in Current Oncology Reports, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating the Use of 18F-FDG PET CT for External Beam Radiotherapy Planning in Gynaecological Malignancies
Published in
Current Oncology Reports, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11912-018-0735-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashleigh Kerr, Nicholas Reed, Rosie Harrand, Kathryn Graham, Azmat H. Sadozye

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,964,865
of 12,698,622 outputs
Outputs from Current Oncology Reports
#254
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,111
of 262,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Oncology Reports
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,698,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.