↓ Skip to main content

Access site complications after transfemoral aortic valve implantation - a comparison of Manta and ProGlide

Overview of attention for article published in CVIR Endovascular, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 386)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Access site complications after transfemoral aortic valve implantation - a comparison of Manta and ProGlide
Published in
CVIR Endovascular, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s42155-018-0026-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pavel Hoffmann, Ahmed Al-Ani, Thomas von Lueder, Jenny Hoffmann, Peter Majak, Ove Hagen, Helga Loose, Nils Einar Kløw, Anders Opdahl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,609,459
of 25,046,311 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#42
of 386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,702
of 347,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,311 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 386 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.