↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Investigation of a Fatigue Resistant Retrofit Method for Highmast Luminaire Support Structures. Part I: Numerical Study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Steel Structures, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Investigation of a Fatigue Resistant Retrofit Method for Highmast Luminaire Support Structures. Part I: Numerical Study
Published in
International Journal of Steel Structures, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13296-018-0001-6
Authors

Yeun Chul Park, Sougata Roy, Reilly W. Thompson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 67%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 67%
Linguistics 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,533,782
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Steel Structures
#16
of 18 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,167
of 327,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Steel Structures
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.