Title |
Biologic adjuvants for fracture healing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Arthritis Research & Therapy, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/ar4053 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mandeep S Virk, Jay R Lieberman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
Other | 15 | 18% |
Unknown | 15 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 51% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 18 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,028
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,708
of 285,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#9
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.