Emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O) from soil surfaces and their historical changes in East Asia: a model-based assessment
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, September 2018
Akihiko Ito, Kazuya Nishina, Kentaro Ishijima, Shoji Hashimoto, Motoko Inatomi
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||75%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||25%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||9||17%|
|Student > Master||5||9%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||4||8%|
|Student > Bachelor||4||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||8||15%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||4||8%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||4||8%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 342,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.