↓ Skip to main content

On the History of Unified Field Theories

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Relativity, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
On the History of Unified Field Theories
Published in
Living Reviews in Relativity, February 2004
DOI 10.12942/lrr-2004-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hubert F. M. Goenner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 4%
China 3 4%
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Brazil 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Uruguay 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 58 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Master 11 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Professor 9 12%
Other 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 48 66%
Mathematics 4 5%
Computer Science 4 5%
Unspecified 3 4%
Philosophy 3 4%
Other 11 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,368,846
of 13,617,861 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#92
of 109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,457
of 266,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,617,861 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them