↓ Skip to main content

Photosynthetic characterization of Australian pitcher plant Cephalotus follicularis

Overview of attention for article published in Photosynthetica, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Photosynthetic characterization of Australian pitcher plant Cephalotus follicularis
Published in
Photosynthetica, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11099-011-0032-0
Authors

A. Pavlovič

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 33%
Researcher 3 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 56%
Environmental Science 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,710,001
of 12,333,288 outputs
Outputs from Photosynthetica
#28
of 44 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,152
of 327,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Photosynthetica
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,333,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.