↓ Skip to main content

Regulative Assumptions, Hinge Propositions and the Peircean Conception of Truth

Overview of attention for article published in Erkenntnis, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Regulative Assumptions, Hinge Propositions and the Peircean Conception of Truth
Published in
Erkenntnis, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10670-011-9351-6
Authors

Andrew W. Howat

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 75%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 3 75%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2011.
All research outputs
#1,635,324
of 3,629,283 outputs
Outputs from Erkenntnis
#44
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,600
of 228,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Erkenntnis
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,629,283 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 53rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.